EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC vs Aviator 3.0T V6 Reserve Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
250 km/h
GCC
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
/
4684 mm
5080 mm
2020 mm
2284 mm
1667 mm
1743 mm
2,829 mm
3025 mm
495 L
500 L
Fuel Economy
/
8.5 Km/L
/
76 L
/
8.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
288 BHP
400 BHP
520 Nm
563 Nm
/
3.0 L
Motor
9
/
options.Lithium
/
215 kW
/
Key Spec
/
3.0 L
/
400 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
7 Seater
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC
- Remote key types
Aviator 3.0T V6 Reserve
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAviator 3.0T V6 Reserve
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC if you care more about overall equipment; choose Aviator 3.0T V6 Reserve if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data, while Aviator 3.0T V6 Reserve has a fuel consumption of 11.76. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2,829 mm, while Aviator 3.0T V6 Reserve has a wheelbase of 3025 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Aviator 3.0T V6 Reserve, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive, while Aviator 3.0T V6 Reserve uses All Wheel Drive.