EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC vs F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
217 km/h
GCC
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4684 mm
4746 mm
2020 mm
2070 mm
1667 mm
1664 mm
2,829 mm
2874 mm
495 L
650 L
Fuel Economy
/
13.5 Km/L
/
63 L
/
13.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
288 BHP
246 BHP - 550 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
345 km
/
7 Seater
5 Seater
/
2.0 L - 5.0 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
288 BHP
246 BHP
520 Nm
365 Nm
/
2.0 L
Motor
9
/
options.Lithium
/
215 kW
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC
- Remote key types
F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEQB 350 SUV 4MATIC
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC if you care more about price; choose F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data, while F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2,829 mm, while F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) has a wheelbase of 2874 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive, while F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) uses All Wheel Drive.