EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC vs Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
216 km/h
GCC
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4684 mm
4371 mm
2020 mm
1996 mm
1667 mm
1649 mm
2,829 mm
2681 mm
495 L
472 L
Fuel Economy
/
13.5 Km/L
/
67 L
/
13.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
288 BHP
200 BHP - 250 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Electric
Gasoline
345 km
/
7 Seater
5 Seater
/
2.0 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
288 BHP
200 BHP
520 Nm
320 Nm
/
2.0 L
Motor
9
/
options.Lithium
/
215 kW
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC
- Remote key types
Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickRange Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC if you care more about interior space; choose Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data, while Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2,829 mm, while Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD has a wheelbase of 2681 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive, while Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD uses All Wheel Drive.