EQE 350+ vs EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
240 km/h
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
5 Doors
4946 mm
4863 mm
1,906 mm
2141 mm
1503 mm
1685 mm
3120 mm
3030 mm
430 L
520 L
Comfort
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Single-speed automatic (EV)
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
TBD
241 BHP - 617
288 - 628 BHP
Automatic & Single-speed automatic & Single-speed automatic (EV)
Automatic & Single-speed AT & Single-speed automatic & Single-speed automatic (EV)
Electric
Electric
425 km - 525 km
410 km
5 - 5
5 - 5
Engine
/
/
Electric
Electric
288 BHP
628 BHP
565 Nm
1000 Nm
Motor
10
8
options.Lithium-ion
options.Lithium
215 kW
460 kW
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQE 350+
EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEQE 350+
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQE 350+ if you care more about price; choose EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQE 350+ has a fuel consumption of No data, while EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQE 350+ has a wheelbase of 3120 mm, while EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3030 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQE 350+ , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQE 350+ uses Rear Wheel Drive, while EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive.