EQE 350+ vs Sequoia Limited Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
200 km/h
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4 Doors
5 Doors
4946 mm
5285 mm
1,906 mm
2021 mm
1503 mm
1892 mm
3120 mm
3100 mm
430 L
2460 L
Fuel Economy
/
9 Km/L
/
85 L
/
9 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
Transmission
Single-speed automatic (EV)
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
241 BHP - 617
381 BHP - 437 BHP
Automatic & Single-speed automatic & Single-speed automatic (EV)
Automatic
Electric
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
425 km - 525 km
/
5 - 5
7 Seater - 8 Seater
/
3.5 L - 5.7 L
/
TBD
Engine
/
3.5 L
Electric
Hybrid
288 BHP
437 BHP
565 Nm
790 Nm
Motor
10
/
options.Lithium-ion
/
215 kW
/
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQE 350+
Sequoia Limited
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Powerful engine performance
- High level of reliability
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Limited technical options
- Relatively high price
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEQE 350+
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQE 350+ if you care more about price; choose Sequoia Limited if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQE 350+ has a fuel consumption of No data, while Sequoia Limited has a fuel consumption of 11.11. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQE 350+ has a wheelbase of 3120 mm, while Sequoia Limited has a wheelbase of 3100 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQE 350+ , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQE 350+ uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Sequoia Limited uses All Wheel Drive.