EQE 350+ vs SQ6 e-tron Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4 Doors
/
4946 mm
/
1,906 mm
/
1503 mm
/
3120 mm
/
430 L
514
/
64
Comfort
/
✓
Interior
/
11.9
/
Dinamica Microfibre
/
✓
/
Sport Seats Plus
Infotainment
/
14.5
Battery/Charging
/
270
/
11
/
10 min
Transmission
Single-speed automatic (EV)
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
对
Key Spec
TBD
TBD
241 BHP - 617
TBD
Automatic & Single-speed automatic & Single-speed automatic (EV)
DHT
Electric
Electric
425 km - 525 km
TBD
5 - 5
5
Engine
/
/
Electric
Electric
288 BHP
/
565 Nm
/
Motor
10
/
options.Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
215 kW
/
/
489
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQE 350+
SQ6 e-tron
- 360 Degree Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEQE 350+
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQE 350+ if you care more about price; choose SQ6 e-tron if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQE 350+ has a fuel consumption of No data, while SQ6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQE 350+ has a wheelbase of 3120 mm, while SQ6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQE 350+ uses Rear Wheel Drive, while SQ6 e-tron uses Four-Wheel Drive.