EQE 350 4MATIC SUV vs Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
/
/
4
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
2,580
/
4,863
4950 mm
1,940
1930 mm
1,685
1730 mm
3,030
2850 mm
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
/
20 Km/L
/
65 L
/
20 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
Transmission
Single-speed AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
288 - 628 BHP
240 BHP - 240 BHP
Automatic & Single-speed AT & Single-speed automatic & Single-speed automatic (EV)
Automatic & CVT & eCVT & Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)
Electric
Hybrid & Hybrid
410 km
/
5 - 5
7 Seater - 7 Seater
/
2.5 L - 2.5 L
/
TBD
Engine
Electric
Hybrid
288
240 BHP
215
/
765
237 Nm
/
In-Line
/
2.5 L
/
None
/
4
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQE 350 4MATIC SUV
Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickHighlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQE 350 4MATIC SUV if you care more about interior space; choose Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQE 350 4MATIC SUV has a fuel consumption of No data, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 5. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQE 350 4MATIC SUV has a wheelbase of 3,030, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQE 350 4MATIC SUV, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQE 350 4MATIC SUV uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.