AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+ vs RX 350h Platinum 2.5L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220
260 km/h
/
4
/
2490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4,946
4890 mm
1,906
1920 mm
1,503
1695 mm
3,120
2850 mm
/
5 Doors
/
350 L
/
160 m
Fuel Economy
/
15 Km/L
/
65 L
/
15 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
14
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
21
Transmission
Single-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
241 BHP - 617
246 BHP - 366 BHP
Automatic & Single-speed automatic & Single-speed automatic (EV)
6 Speed Automatic Transmission & 8 Speed Automatic Transmission & AT & Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT)
Electric
Hybrid & Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid
425 km - 525 km
/
5 - 5
5 Seater - 5 Seater
/
3.5 L - 3.5 L
/
TBD
Engine
/
2.5
Electric
Hybrid
617
246 BHP
950
315 Nm
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+
RX 350h Platinum 2.5L
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Luxury design and high quality
- Good fuel efficiency
- Advanced technology and amenities
Negative
- The price is high for some competitors
- Limited back-end storage space
- Less sharp control compared to some sports cars
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+ if you care more about interior space; choose RX 350h Platinum 2.5L if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of No data, while RX 350h Platinum 2.5L has a fuel consumption of 6.67. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 3,120, while RX 350h Platinum 2.5L has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+ uses Four-Wheel Drive, while RX 350h Platinum 2.5L uses Front Wheel Drive.