EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC vs C5 2025 Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
240 km/h
180 km/h
GCC
GCC
/
4
/
1496 cc
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
5 Doors
5
4863 mm
4400
2141 mm
1830
1685 mm
1588
3030 mm
2630
520 L
360/1075
/
1381
Fuel Economy
/
11.2
/
51
Comfort
✓
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Digital
Digital
✓
Dual Zone
✓
Electric
✓
/
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
10.25
✓
Android LCD
✓
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
CVT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
Macpherson
/
Torsion Beam
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
Key Spec
TBD
/
288 - 628 BHP
156 - 197
Automatic & Single-speed AT & Single-speed automatic & Single-speed automatic (EV)
7 Speed DCT & 7DCT & CVT
Electric
Gasoline
410 km
/
5 - 5
5
/
1.5 L - 1.5 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
628 BHP
156 BHP
1000 Nm
230
/
In-Line
/
1.5 L
/
4
Motor
8
/
options.Lithium
/
460 kW
/
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
ECO, Sport
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC
- Remote key types
C5 2025 Comfort
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC if you care more about interior space; choose C5 2025 Comfort if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data, while C5 2025 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 8.93. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3030 mm, while C5 2025 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2630. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive, while C5 2025 Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive.