EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC vs EHS9 Executive Comparison

Car Information

3.5

/

420

≥500

90.6

99

/

160+245

Engine / Motor

240 km/h

200 km/h

GCC

Chinese

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

5 Doors

5 Doors

4863 mm

5209 mm

2141 mm

2010 mm

1685 mm

1713 mm

3030 mm

3110 mm

520 L

438 L

/

200 m

Comfort

Smart Entry

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Leather

Digital

Digital

4-Zone

Electric

Bucket

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

16.2

Android LCD

8

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

TBD

TBD

288 - 628 BHP

429 BHP - 543 BHP

Automatic & Single-speed AT & Single-speed automatic & Single-speed automatic (EV)

Automatic

Electric

Electric

410 km

320 km - 515 km

5 - 5

4 Seater - 7 Seater

Exterior

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

Electric

Electric

628 BHP

429 BHP

1000 Nm

300+450

Motor

8

8

options.Lithium

options.Lithium-Ion

460 kW

160+245 kW

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC

    • Remote key types
  • EHS9 Executive

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickEHS9 Executive

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC if you care more about overall equipment; choose EHS9 Executive if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mercedes Benz | EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC

VS

Cadillac | Escalade V 6.2L Supercharged

Mercedes Benz | EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC

VS

Maserati | Maserati Levante 2023 3.0T V6 F Tributo

Mercedes Benz | EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC

VS

Porsche | Porsche Cayenne Coupe 2020 Turbo

Mercedes Benz | EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC

VS

Porsche | Porsche Cayenne Coupe 2019 Turbo

Mercedes Benz | EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC

VS

Land Rover | Range Rover SE P400 3.0L

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data, while EHS9 Executive has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3030 mm, while EHS9 Executive has a wheelbase of 3110 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS9 Executive, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive, while EHS9 Executive uses All Wheel Drive.