EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC vs Fronx GL 1.5L Hybrid Comparison

Car Information

3.5

/

420

/

90.6

/

Engine / Motor

240 km/h

200 km/h

GCC

GCC

/

4

/

1462 cc

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

5 Doors

5 Doors

4863 mm

3995 mm

2141 mm

1765 mm

1685 mm

1550 mm

3030 mm

2520 mm

520 L

605 L

/

1055-1060

/

170 m

Fuel Economy

/

18 Km/L

/

37 L

/

18 Km/L

Comfort

Keyless Entry

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Fabric

Digital

Digital

Single

Manual

Standard

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

8

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

7

Standard LCD

4

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

195/60 R16

/

195/60 R16

Key Spec

TBD

/

288 - 628 BHP

103 BHP - 104 BHP

Automatic & Single-speed AT & Single-speed automatic & Single-speed automatic (EV)

Automatic

Electric

Hybrid

410 km

/

5 - 5

5 Seater

/

1.5 L

/

TBD

Exterior

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

Electric

Hybrid

628 BHP

104 BHP

1000 Nm

137 Nm

/

In-Line

/

1.5 L

/

None

/

4

Motor

8

/

options.Lithium

/

460 kW

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC

    • Remote key types
  • Fronx GL 1.5L Hybrid

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Modern and modern exterior design
  • Excellent fuel efficiency;
  • Low maintenance cost

Negative

  • Limited dynamic performance
  • Suspension comfort needs to be improved
  • Interior fittings are limited by technologies

Related comparisons

Editor's PickFronx GL 1.5L Hybrid

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC if you care more about interior space; choose Fronx GL 1.5L Hybrid if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mercedes Benz | EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC

VS

Cadillac | Escalade V 6.2L Supercharged

Mercedes Benz | EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC

VS

Maserati | Maserati Levante 2023 3.0T V6 F Tributo

Mercedes Benz | EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC

VS

Porsche | Porsche Cayenne Coupe 2020 Turbo

Mercedes Benz | EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC

VS

Porsche | Porsche Cayenne Coupe 2019 Turbo

Mercedes Benz | EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC

VS

Land Rover | Range Rover SE P400 3.0L

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data, while Fronx GL 1.5L Hybrid has a fuel consumption of 5.56. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3030 mm, while Fronx GL 1.5L Hybrid has a wheelbase of 2520 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive, while Fronx GL 1.5L Hybrid uses Front Wheel Drive.