CarteaCompare CarsEQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC vs G9 RWD Standard Range

EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC vs G9 RWD Standard Range Comparison

Car Information

3.5

6.6

420

460 kM

90.6

78.2 kWh

Engine / Motor

240 km/h

200

GCC

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

5 Doors

5

4863 mm

4891

2141 mm

1937

1685 mm

1680

3030 mm

2998

520 L

660/1576 Front Trunk 71L

/

2235

/

19

Comfort

Smart Key

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

Interior

Leather

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Front & Back Row Seats

/

10.25

/

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

Digital

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

7

/

/

/

Front And Rear

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

14.96

8

/

14.96

/

/

/

/

/

/

Battery/Charging

/

CCS2

/

20min = 10-80% SOC

/

up to 260

/

≥9h

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Rear Drive

/

Double Wishbone Independent Suspension

/

Multi-link Independent Suspension

Wheels/brakes

/

Ventilated Braking Discs

/

Ventilated Braking Discs

/

255/55R19

/

255/55R19

Key Spec

TBD

TBD

288 - 628 BHP

310 BHP

Automatic & Single-speed AT & Single-speed automatic & Single-speed automatic (EV)

Automatic

Electric

Electric

410 km

460

5 - 5

5

Exterior

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

Electric

Electric

628 BHP

310 BHP

1000 Nm

/

Motor

8

/

options.Lithium

LFP

460 kW

230

/

430

/

1

/

Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor

/

310

Technologies

/

/

5

/

12

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC

    • Remote key types
  • G9 RWD Standard Range

    • Power Tailgate
    • Welcome Light
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Heater
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK)
    • Front Cross Traffic Alert
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • ABS
    • EBA/BA
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickG9 RWD Standard Range

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC if you care more about interior space; choose G9 RWD Standard Range if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mercedes Benz | EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC

VS

Cadillac | Escalade V 6.2L Supercharged

Mercedes Benz | EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC

VS

Maserati | Maserati Levante 2023 3.0T V6 F Tributo

Mercedes Benz | EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC

VS

Porsche | Porsche Cayenne Coupe 2020 Turbo

Mercedes Benz | EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC

VS

Porsche | Porsche Cayenne Coupe 2019 Turbo

Mercedes Benz | EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC

VS

Land Rover | Range Rover SE P400 3.0L

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data, while G9 RWD Standard Range has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3030 mm, while G9 RWD Standard Range has a wheelbase of 2998. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive, while G9 RWD Standard Range uses Rear Drive.