EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC vs Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
240 km/h
/
GCC
GCC
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4863 mm
4950 mm
2141 mm
1930 mm
1685 mm
1730 mm
3030 mm
2850 mm
520 L
/
Fuel Economy
/
20 Km/L
/
65 L
/
20 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
288 - 628 BHP
240 BHP - 240 BHP
Automatic & Single-speed AT & Single-speed automatic & Single-speed automatic (EV)
Automatic & CVT & eCVT & Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)
Electric
Hybrid & Hybrid
410 km
/
5 - 5
7 Seater - 7 Seater
/
2.5 L - 2.5 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Hybrid
628 BHP
240 BHP
1000 Nm
237 Nm
/
In-Line
/
2.5 L
/
None
/
4
Motor
8
/
options.Lithium
/
460 kW
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC
- Remote key types
Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC if you care more about interior space; choose Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 5. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3030 mm, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.