EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC vs S05 Pro EV Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
240 km/h
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
5 Doors
/
4863 mm
4620
2141 mm
1900
1685 mm
1600
3030 mm
2880
520 L
/
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
DHT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
/
255/60 R18
/
255/60 R18
Key Spec
TBD
TBD
288 - 628 BHP
238 BHP
Automatic & Single-speed AT & Single-speed automatic & Single-speed automatic (EV)
DHT
Electric
Electric
410 km
TBD
5 - 5
5
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Electric
628 BHP
238 BHP
1000 Nm
320
Motor
8
/
options.Lithium
/
460 kW
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC
- Remote key types
S05 Pro EV
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Active Safety Warning System
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickS05 Pro EV
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC if you care more about interior space; choose S05 Pro EV if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data, while S05 Pro EV has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3030 mm, while S05 Pro EV has a wheelbase of 2880. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive, while S05 Pro EV uses No data.