EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC vs Suzuki SX4 2014 Outdoor Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
240 km/h
180
GCC
/
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4863 mm
4150
2141 mm
1755
1685 mm
1605
3030 mm
2500
520 L
253
Fuel Economy
/
13.9
/
42
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
CVT
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
288 - 628 BHP
150 BHP
Automatic & Single-speed AT & Single-speed automatic & Single-speed automatic (EV)
CVT
Electric
Gasoline
410 km
/
5 - 5
5 Seater
/
2.0 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
628 BHP
150 BHP
1000 Nm
190
/
2.0 L
Motor
8
/
options.Lithium
/
460 kW
/
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC
- Remote key types
Suzuki SX4 2014 Outdoor
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Steering Adjustment
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSuzuki SX4 2014 Outdoor
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC if you care more about interior space; choose Suzuki SX4 2014 Outdoor if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data, while Suzuki SX4 2014 Outdoor has a fuel consumption of 7.19. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3030 mm, while Suzuki SX4 2014 Outdoor has a wheelbase of 2500. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive, while Suzuki SX4 2014 Outdoor uses All Wheel Drive.