EQM5 T3 Edition vs Stelvio Veloce Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
230 km/h
Dimensions
4 Seater
5 Seater
5040 mm
4680 mm
1910 mm
2160 mm
1569 mm
1670 mm
2990 mm
2818 mm
433 L
525 L
Fuel Economy
/
11.2 Km/L
/
64 L
/
11.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
134 BHP
280 BHP - 510 BHP
DHT
Automatic
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
4 Seater - 5
5 Seater
/
2.0 L - 2.9 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
134 BHP
280 BHP
/
2.0 L
/
400 Nm
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQM5 T3 Edition
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Stelvio Veloce
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickStelvio Veloce
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQM5 T3 Edition if you care more about interior space; choose Stelvio Veloce if you care more about power.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQM5 T3 Edition has a fuel consumption of No data, while Stelvio Veloce has a fuel consumption of 8.93. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQM5 T3 Edition has a wheelbase of 2990 mm, while Stelvio Veloce has a wheelbase of 2818 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQM5 T3 Edition, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQM5 T3 Edition uses Front Wheel Drive, while Stelvio Veloce uses All Wheel Drive.