EQS 450+ vs Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
250 km/h
/
6
/
2999 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4,946
4924 mm
2,103
1948 mm
1,503
1796 mm
3,120
2995 mm
/
4 Doors
/
655 L
/
198 m
Fuel Economy
/
11
/
85 L
/
9 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Single-speed automatic
9-speed automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
All Wheel Drive
Engine
/
3.0 L
Electric
Gasoline
335 hp
429 BHP
245-265 kW
320
568-565
560 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQS 450+
Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQS 450+ if you care more about interior space; choose Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ if you care more about power.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQS 450+ has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQS 450+ has a wheelbase of 3,120, while Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 2995 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQS 450+, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQS 450+ uses Rear Drive, while Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ uses All Wheel Drive.