EQS 450+ vs X6 xDrive40i M Sport Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
250 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4,946
4935 mm
2,103
2212 mm
1,503
1696 mm
3,120
2975 mm
/
580 L
Fuel Economy
/
10.1 Km/L
/
83 L
/
10.1 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
Single-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
All Wheel Drive
Engine
/
3.0 L
Electric
Gasoline
335 hp
340 BHP
245-265 kW
/
568-565
450 Nm
Key Spec
/
3.0 L - 3000 L
/
225 BHP - 530 BHP
/
Automatic & CVT
/
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
4 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQS 450+
X6 xDrive40i M Sport
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickX6 xDrive40i M Sport
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQS 450+ if you care more about interior space; choose X6 xDrive40i M Sport if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQS 450+ has a fuel consumption of No data, while X6 xDrive40i M Sport has a fuel consumption of 9.9. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQS 450+ has a wheelbase of 3,120, while X6 xDrive40i M Sport has a wheelbase of 2975 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQS 450+, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQS 450+ uses Rear Drive, while X6 xDrive40i M Sport uses All Wheel Drive.