EQS 450+ vs X6M Competition 4.4T xDrive Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
250 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4,946
4941 mm
2,103
2019 mm
1,503
1693 mm
3,120
2933 mm
/
580 L
Fuel Economy
/
9 Km/L
/
85 L
/
9 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
Single-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
All Wheel Drive
Engine
/
4.4 L
Electric
Gasoline
335 hp
617 BHP
245-265 kW
/
568-565
750 Nm
Key Spec
/
4.4 L
/
555 BHP - 617 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQS 450+
X6M Competition 4.4T xDrive
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickX6M Competition 4.4T xDrive
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQS 450+ if you care more about interior space; choose X6M Competition 4.4T xDrive if you care more about power.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQS 450+ has a fuel consumption of No data, while X6M Competition 4.4T xDrive has a fuel consumption of 11.11. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQS 450+ has a wheelbase of 3,120, while X6M Competition 4.4T xDrive has a wheelbase of 2933 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQS 450+, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQS 450+ uses Rear Drive, while X6M Competition 4.4T xDrive uses All Wheel Drive.