EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ vs Range Rover SE P360 3.0L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4946 mm
/
2103 mm
/
1503 mm
/
3120 mm
/
430 L
/
Fuel Economy
/
8.5
Comfort
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
TBD
/
760 BHP
360 BHP - 525 BHP
Automatic & Single-speed Automatic
Automatic
Electric
Gasoline
540 km
/
5 Seater
4 Seater - 5 Seater
/
3.0 L - 5.0 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
760 BHP
360 BHP
1020 Nm
/
/
3.0 L
Motor
9
/
options.Lithium-ion
/
560 kW
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+
- Remote key types
Range Rover SE P360 3.0L
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickRange Rover SE P360 3.0L
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ if you care more about power; choose Range Rover SE P360 3.0L if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of No data, while Range Rover SE P360 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.76. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 3120 mm, while Range Rover SE P360 3.0L has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ uses All Wheel Drive, while Range Rover SE P360 3.0L uses No data.