EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ vs Bentayga 4.0L V8 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
290 km/h
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4946 mm
5140 mm
2103 mm
1998 mm
1503 mm
1742 mm
3120 mm
2995 mm
430 L
484 L
Fuel Economy
/
8.8 Km/L
/
85 L
/
8.8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Single-speed Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
760 BHP
542 BHP - 626 BHP
Automatic & Single-speed Automatic
Automatic
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
540 km
/
5 Seater
5 Seater
/
4.0 L - 6.0 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
760 BHP
542 BHP
560 kW
/
1020 Nm
770 Nm
/
4.0 L
Motor
9
/
options.Lithium-ion
/
560 kW
/
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+
- Remote key types
Bentayga 4.0L V8
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ if you care more about price; choose Bentayga 4.0L V8 if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of No data, while Bentayga 4.0L V8 has a fuel consumption of 11.36. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 3120 mm, while Bentayga 4.0L V8 has a wheelbase of 2995 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ uses All Wheel Drive, while Bentayga 4.0L V8 uses All Wheel Drive.