EQS 580 4MATIC vs EQS 580 4MATIC Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220 km/h
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
/
4 Doors
/
5216 mm
/
2103 mm
/
1503 mm
/
3120 mm
/
430 L
/
Comfort
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Single-speed automatic (EV)
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
/
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
/
/
Electric
/
525 BHP
/
855 Nm
/
Motor
9
/
options.Lithium
/
390–395 kW
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQS 580 4MATIC
- Remote key types
EQS 580 4MATIC
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEQS 580 4MATIC
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQS 580 4MATIC if you care more about overall equipment; choose EQS 580 4MATIC if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQS 580 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data, while EQS 580 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQS 580 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3120 mm, while EQS 580 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3120 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQS 580 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive, while EQS 580 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive.