EQS 580 4MATIC vs G 500 Premium+ Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220 km/h
210 km/h
GCC
GCC
/
8
/
3990 cc
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
5 Doors
5216 mm
4669 mm
2103 mm
1931 mm
1503 mm
1969 mm
3120 mm
2890 mm
430 L
667 L
Fuel Economy
/
6 Km/L
/
100 L
/
6 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Single-speed automatic (EV)
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
335 hp - 525 BHP
330 - 585 BHP
Automatic & Single-speed automatic & Single-speed automatic (EV)
2-speed automatic (for off-road low-range gear) & 9-speed automatic & 9G-TRONIC 9-speed automatic & Automatic
Electric
Diesel & Electric & Gasoline
525 km - 595 km
/
5 - 5
5 - 5
/
2.9 L - 4.0 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
/
4.0 L
Electric
Gasoline
525 BHP
416 BHP
855 Nm
610 Nm
/
V
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Motor
9
/
options.Lithium
/
390–395 kW
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQS 580 4MATIC
- Remote key types
G 500 Premium+
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQS 580 4MATIC if you care more about interior space; choose G 500 Premium+ if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQS 580 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data, while G 500 Premium+ has a fuel consumption of 16.67. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQS 580 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3120 mm, while G 500 Premium+ has a wheelbase of 2890 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQS 580 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQS 580 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive, while G 500 Premium+ uses All Wheel Drive.