EQS 580 SUV 4MATIC vs iX xDrive40 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
200 km/h
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
5125 mm
4953 mm
2157 mm
1967 mm
1,718 mm
1695 mm
3210 mm
3000 mm
645 L
500 L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Single-speed automatic (EV)
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
TBD
357 BHP - 650
326 BHP - 619 BHP
1-speed direct drive (EV) & Automatic & Single-speed automatic & Single-speed automatic (EV)
TBD
Electric
Electric
485 km - 700 km
TBD
5 - 7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Electric
544 BHP
326 BHP
400
/
858 Nm
630 Nm
Motor
10
/
options.Lithium-ion
/
400 kW
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQS 580 SUV 4MATIC
- Remote key types
iX xDrive40
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickiX xDrive40
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQS 580 SUV 4MATIC if you care more about interior space; choose iX xDrive40 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQS 580 SUV 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data, while iX xDrive40 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQS 580 SUV 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3210 mm, while iX xDrive40 has a wheelbase of 3000 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQS 580 SUV 4MATIC , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQS 580 SUV 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive, while iX xDrive40 uses All Wheel Drive.