Equinox 2.0T Premier (AWD) vs Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
/
4
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4650 mm
4950 mm
1844 mm
1930 mm
1661 mm
1730 mm
2725 mm
2850 mm
846 L
/
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
13.5 Km/L
20 Km/L
59 L
65 L
13.5 Km/L
20 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Safety
✓
/
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
252 BHP
240 BHP
352 Nm
237 Nm
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
Key Spec
/
2.5 L - 2.5 L
/
240 - 240
/
CVT & Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)
/
Hybrid
/
TBD
/
7 - 7
Comparison of configuration highlights
Equinox 2.0T Premier (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickHighlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Equinox 2.0T Premier (AWD) if you care more about power; choose Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Equinox 2.0T Premier (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 5. Therefore, Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Equinox 2.0T Premier (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2725 mm, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Equinox 2.0T Premier (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.