Equinox EV RS vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
161 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
21
/
/
4341 mm
/
1804 mm
/
1693 mm
/
2676 mm
/
414 L
Fuel Economy
/
17.2 Km/L
/
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Interior
11
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Forward Collision Alert
/
Blind Zone Steering Assist(3)
/
Rear pedestrian alert(3)
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
17.7
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L - 2.0 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
170 BHP - 252 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Electric & Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
Black, sporty, Diamond Grille
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
/
1.6 L
Electric
Gasoline
213
115 BHP
320NM
156 Nm
Technologies
Following Distance Indicator(3)
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Equinox EV RS
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Lane Following Assist
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Equinox EV RS if you care more about power; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Equinox EV RS has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Equinox EV RS has a wheelbase of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Equinox EV RS uses Front Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.