Equinox EV RS vs Juke 1.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180 km/h
/
4
/
999 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
21
/
/
5 Doors
/
4210 mm
/
1800 mm
/
1595 mm
/
2636 mm
/
251 L
/
179 m
Fuel Economy
/
15 Km/L
/
52 L
/
15 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
11
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Forward Collision Alert
/
Blind Zone Steering Assist(3)
/
Rear pedestrian alert(3)
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
17.7
7
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
6
/
Android LCD
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L - 2.0 L
1.0 L - 1.6 L
170 BHP - 252 BHP
115 BHP - 190 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & Manual
Electric & Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
Black, sporty, Diamond Grille
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
1.0 L
Electric
Gasoline
213
115 BHP
320NM
180 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
Following Distance Indicator(3)
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Equinox EV RS
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Lane Following Assist
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Juke 1.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Equinox EV RS if you care more about power; choose Juke 1.0T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Equinox EV RS has a fuel consumption of No data, while Juke 1.0T has a fuel consumption of 6.67. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Equinox EV RS has a wheelbase of No data, while Juke 1.0T has a wheelbase of 2636 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Equinox EV RS uses Front Drive, while Juke 1.0T uses Front Wheel Drive.