CarteaCompare CarsEquinox EV RS vs Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

Equinox EV RS vs Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD Comparison

Car Information

8

/

513KM

/

80 kW

/

Engine / Motor

/

190 km/h

/

4

/

3490 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5

7 Seater

21

/

/

5 Doors

/

5004 mm

/

1978 mm

/

1802 mm

/

2900 mm

/

470 L

Fuel Economy

/

9.4 Km/L

/

74 L

/

9.4 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

Interior

11

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

Forward Collision Alert

/

Blind Zone Steering Assist(3)

/

Rear pedestrian alert(3)

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

17.7

/

/

/

/

6

/

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.5 L - 2.0 L

2.5 L - 3.5 L

170 BHP - 252 BHP

250 BHP - 271 BHP

Automatic

9AT & Automatic & CVT

Electric & Gasoline

Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

7 - 8 Seater

Exterior

Black, sporty, Diamond Grille

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

/

3.5 L

Electric

Gasoline

213

271 BHP

320NM

340 Nm

/

In-Line

/

None

/

4

Technologies

Following Distance Indicator(3)

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Equinox EV RS

    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder
  • Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Spacious interior space and flexible storage
  • Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
  • Comprehensive and advanced security equipment

Negative

  • Medium fuel economy
  • Traditional interior design needs updating
  • Noticeable noise during high speeds

Related comparisons

Editor's PickPathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Equinox EV RS if you care more about overall equipment; choose Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Chevrolet | Equinox EV RS

VS

Exeed | RX Flagship 2.0T

Chevrolet | Equinox EV RS

VS

GAC | GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD)

Chevrolet | Equinox EV RS

VS

GAC | GS8 2.0T GX (4WD)

Chevrolet | Equinox EV RS

VS

Toyota | Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door)

Chevrolet | Equinox EV RS

VS

Toyota | Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Equinox EV RS has a fuel consumption of No data, while Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Equinox EV RS has a wheelbase of No data, while Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a wheelbase of 2900 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Equinox EV RS uses Front Drive, while Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive.