EREV RWD vs Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
4
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
4,825
4950 mm
1,980
1930 mm
1,620
1730 mm
2,940
2850 mm
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
/
20 Km/L
/
65 L
/
20 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
Transmission
Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L
2.5 L - 2.5 L
310 - 590
240 BHP - 240 BHP
Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic & Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic.
Automatic & CVT & eCVT & Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)
Electric & Hybrid
Hybrid & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5
7 Seater - 7 Seater
Engine
1.5 L
2.5 L
Hybrid
Hybrid
310
240 BHP
1,152
/
367
237 Nm
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EREV RWD
Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Stable driving comfort
- Spacious interior design
- Advanced safety systems
Negative
- Moderate engine performance
- Relatively high price
- Limitations in storage space
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEREV RWD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EREV RWD if you care more about price; choose Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EREV RWD has a fuel consumption of No data, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 5. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EREV RWD has a wheelbase of 2,940, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EREV RWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EREV RWD uses No data, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.