EREV RWD vs Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) Comparison

Car Information

1,152 km

/

3.63 kWh/L

/

Engine / Motor

/

4

/

GCC

Dimensions

5

7 Seater

4,825

4950 mm

1,980

1930 mm

1,620

1730 mm

2,940

2850 mm

/

5 Doors

Fuel Economy

/

20 Km/L

/

65 L

/

20 Km/L

Comfort

/

Transmission

Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

All Wheel Drive

Engine

1.5 L

2.5 L

Hybrid

Hybrid

310

240 BHP

1,152

/

367

237 Nm

/

In-Line

/

None

/

4

Key Spec

/

2.5 L - 2.5 L

/

240 - 240

/

CVT & Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)

/

Hybrid

/

TBD

/

7 - 7

Exterior

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • EREV RWD

    • Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)

      • Rear Camera

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickHighlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose EREV RWD if you care more about interior space; choose Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) if you care more about overall equipment.

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, EREV RWD has a fuel consumption of No data, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 5. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, EREV RWD has a wheelbase of 2,940, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EREV RWD, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EREV RWD uses No data, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.