ES 300h vs 735 Li Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
/
4
/
2490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4 Doors
/
4975 mm
5391
1865 mm
1950
1445 mm
1544
2870 mm
3215
/
540
/
/
Fuel Economy
15 Km/L
7.9
50 L
74
15 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
10
/
Transmission
E-CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.5 L
2.0 L - 3.0 L
204 BHP - 302 BHP
258 - 523
CVT & Direct Shift, 8AT & E-CVT
8-speed automatic (Steptronic Sport) & 8-speed shiftable automatic transmission (Steptronic) & 8-speed Steptronic Automatic & Automatic
Hybrid & Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
2.5 L
3.0
Hybrid
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
214 BHP
286 BHP
356 Nm
425
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
ES 300h
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
735 Li
Review Comparison
Positive
- Luxurious and refined interior design
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Smooth and comfortable driving performance
Negative
- Narrow rear cargo space
- The infotainment system is relatively old
- A higher price than competitors in the same category
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ES 300h if you care more about fuel economy; choose 735 Li if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ES 300h has a fuel consumption of 6.67, while 735 Li has a fuel consumption of 12.66. Therefore, ES 300h is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ES 300h has a wheelbase of 2870 mm, while 735 Li has a wheelbase of 3215. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 735 Li, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ES 300h uses Front Wheel Drive, while 735 Li uses No data.