ES 300h vs E300 3.0L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
260 km/h
4
4
2490 cc
2998 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
4 Doors
4975 mm
4949 mm
1865 mm
1880 mm
1445 mm
1480 mm
2870 mm
2961 mm
/
540 L
/
/
Fuel Economy
15 Km/L
9 Km/L
50 L
66 L
15 Km/L
9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
✓
Digital
Digital
✓
/
Dual Zone
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
8
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
✓
✓
/
10
✓
Transmission
E-CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.5 L
2.0 L - 3.0 L
204 BHP - 302 BHP
204 BHP - 402
CVT & Direct Shift, 8AT & E-CVT
7-speed Automatic (7G-TRONIC Plus) & 9-speed automatic & Automatic
Hybrid & Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid
Petrol & Diesel & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 5 Seater
4 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.5 L
3.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
None
Single Turbo
4
4
214 BHP
285 BHP
356 Nm
420 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
ES 300h
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
E300 3.0L
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- Luxurious and refined interior design
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Smooth and comfortable driving performance
Negative
- Narrow rear cargo space
- The infotainment system is relatively old
- A higher price than competitors in the same category
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ES 300h if you care more about price; choose E300 3.0L if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ES 300h has a fuel consumption of 6.67, while E300 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.11. Therefore, ES 300h is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ES 300h has a wheelbase of 2870 mm, while E300 3.0L has a wheelbase of 2961 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, E300 3.0L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ES 300h uses Front Wheel Drive, while E300 3.0L uses All Wheel Drive.