ES BEV vs Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
240 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
21"
/
4945
4830 mm
1978
1870 mm
1474
1400 mm
3000
2905 mm
/
406 L
Fuel Economy
/
12.7 Km/L
/
60 L
/
12.7 Km/L
Comfort
NFC
/
Welcome pedal
/
✓
/
4-Way Power
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
ESP
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
23
/
Battery/Charging
5 min
/
/
/
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
/
2.0 L
Electric
Gasoline
473 HP
251 BHP
353kw
/
660Nm
353 Nm
Motor
2
/
Technologies
L2 ADAS
/
Rear & Front
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Key Spec
/
2.0 L - 3.3 L
/
251 BHP - 365 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
Comparison of configuration highlights
ES BEV
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Steering Adjustment
- Driving Recorder
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Lock
Stinger 2.0T (255 PS)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickStinger 2.0T (255 PS)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ES BEV if you care more about interior space; choose Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ES BEV has a fuel consumption of No data, while Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) has a fuel consumption of 7.87. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ES BEV has a wheelbase of 3000, while Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) has a wheelbase of 2905 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ES BEV, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ES BEV uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) uses Rear Wheel Drive.