ES BEV vs Xpeng P7+ RWD Long Range Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200
Dimensions
5
5
21"
/
4945
5071
1978
1937
1474
1512
3000
3000
/
Flush Door
/
2100
/
1931 L
/
573 L
Fuel Economy
/
/
Comfort
NFC
/
Welcome pedal
/
✓
/
4-Way Power
/
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
ESP
/
✓
/
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
23
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
5 min
/
/
10-80% In 12 Minutes
Transmission
AT
AT
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Rear Drive
Exterior
✓
/
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
/
Electric
Electric
473 HP
245
353kw
181
660Nm
/
Motor
2
/
Technologies
L2 ADAS
/
Rear & Front
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
ES BEV
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Steering Adjustment
- Driving Recorder
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Lock
Xpeng P7+ RWD Long Range
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickXpeng P7+ RWD Long Range
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ES BEV if you care more about power; choose Xpeng P7+ RWD Long Range if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ES BEV has a fuel consumption of No data, while Xpeng P7+ RWD Long Range has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ES BEV has a wheelbase of 3000, while Xpeng P7+ RWD Long Range has a wheelbase of 3000. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ES BEV uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Xpeng P7+ RWD Long Range uses Rear Drive.