ES300h Platinum 2.5L vs ES300h Platinum 2.5L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
260 km/h
/
4
/
2490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
/
4 Doors
/
4975 mm
/
1865 mm
/
1445 mm
/
2870 mm
/
450 L
/
150 m
/
Fuel Economy
15 Km/L
/
50 L
/
15 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
17
/
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.5 L
/
204 BHP - 302 BHP
/
E-CVT
/
Gasoline & Hybrid
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
2.5 L
/
Hybrid
/
None
/
4
/
204 BHP
/
356 Nm
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
ES300h Platinum 2.5L
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
ES300h Platinum 2.5L
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Luxurious and refined interior design
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Smooth and comfortable driving performance
Negative
- Narrow rear cargo space
- The infotainment system is relatively old
- A higher price than competitors in the same category
Positive
- Luxurious and refined interior design
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Smooth and comfortable driving performance
Negative
- Narrow rear cargo space
- The infotainment system is relatively old
- A higher price than competitors in the same category
Related comparisons
Editor's PickES300h Platinum 2.5L
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ES300h Platinum 2.5L if you care more about overall equipment; choose ES300h Platinum 2.5L if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ES300h Platinum 2.5L has a fuel consumption of 6.67, while ES300h Platinum 2.5L has a fuel consumption of 6.67. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ES300h Platinum 2.5L has a wheelbase of 2870 mm, while ES300h Platinum 2.5L has a wheelbase of 2870 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ES300h Platinum 2.5L uses Four Wheel Drive, while ES300h Platinum 2.5L uses Four Wheel Drive.