ES90 vs Jetta 2.0 S Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
193 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
2441
/
5000
4659 mm
2120
1778 mm
1549
1482 mm
3102
2651 mm
/
510 L
Fuel Economy
/
14.1 Km/L
/
55 L
/
14.1 Km/L
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
DHT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
333 BHP
115 BHP - 170 BHP
DHT
7 Speed DSG Transmission & Automatic & Manual
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
5
5 - 5
/
2.0 L - 2.5 L
/
TBD
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
333 BHP
115 BHP
/
2.0 L
/
170 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
ES90
Jetta 2.0 S
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickJetta 2.0 S
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ES90 if you care more about interior space; choose Jetta 2.0 S if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ES90 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Jetta 2.0 S has a fuel consumption of 7.09. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ES90 has a wheelbase of 3102, while Jetta 2.0 S has a wheelbase of 2651 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ES90, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ES90 uses Rear Drive, while Jetta 2.0 S uses Front Wheel Drive.