CarteaCompare CarsEscalade V-Series vs Bronco Badlands 2.7L

Escalade V-Series vs Bronco Badlands 2.7L Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

180 km/h

/

6

/

2698 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

8

5 Seater

5383mm

4800 mm

2059mm

1937 mm

1948mm

1962 mm

3071mm

2950 mm

722L

562 L

/

4 Doors

/

260 m

Fuel Economy

91L

79 L

/

9.2 Km/L

/

9.2 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

Leather

Leather

/

/

/

/

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

7

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

12.6

/

/

Android LCD

36

7

/

12

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

/

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Key Spec

6.2 L - 6.2 L

2.3 L - 3.0 L

403 BHP - 682 BHP

181 - 418 BHP

& Automatic

8-speed Automatic & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7 Seater - 8

4 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

6.2L

2.7 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

420HP

330 BHP

623.7Nm

542 Nm

/

V

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Escalade V-Series

    • Number of Airbags
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • Bronco Badlands 2.7L

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Powerful engine performance
  • Spacious interior space
  • Advanced entertainment system

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • The highest price compared to competitors
  • Large size can be difficult to maneuver

Positive

  • Attractive and iconic design
  • Excellent off-road capabilities
  • Multiple engine options

Negative

  • High price for top categories
  • Limited internal storage space
  • Significant fuel consumption

Related comparisons

Editor's PickBronco Badlands 2.7L

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Escalade V-Series if you care more about interior space; choose Bronco Badlands 2.7L if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Cadillac | Escalade V-Series

VS

Mercedes Benz | Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S 4MATIC+

Cadillac | Escalade V-Series

VS

Toyota | Raize XLE

Cadillac | Escalade V-Series

VS

BMW | BMW XM 2024 V8 650HP

Cadillac | Escalade V-Series

VS

Mercedes Benz | EQS 580 SUV 4MATIC

Cadillac | Escalade V-Series

VS

Mercedes Benz | EQS 580 4MATIC

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Escalade V-Series has a fuel consumption of No data, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L has a fuel consumption of 10.87. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Escalade V-Series has a wheelbase of 3071mm, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L has a wheelbase of 2950 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Escalade V-Series, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Escalade V-Series uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L uses Four Wheel Drive.