ET BEV vs EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) Comparison

Car Information

410km

443

77kwh

76.1

19.8 kWh/100km

/

/

8.2

Engine / Motor

/

190

/

N/A, Electric

Dimensions

5

7

21"

/

4980

5009

1975

1979

1694

1750

3000

3099

/

572

Fuel Economy

19.8 kWh/100km

/

Comfort

/

NFC

/

4-direction electric

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

Front & Back Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

front seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

15.6

/

/

/

/

/

/

23

/

/

/

Battery/Charging

10 min/ 20-80%

/

Transmission

AT

E-SHIFT (SBW)

Chassis & Steering

✓ + CDC

/

Four-Wheel Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

Exterior

/

كهربائي

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

/

SINGLE

Electric

Electric

473HP

215 BHP

353kw

/

/

/

660Nm

350

/

SINGLE

Motor

2

/

Technologies

L2 ADAS

/

Front & Rear

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Key Spec

/

TBD

/

201 BHP - 380

/

Automatic & Automatic & E-SHIFT (SBW)

/

Electric

/

TBD

/

6 - 7

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • ET BEV

    • Power Tailgate
    • Keyless Entry
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Driving Recorder
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Crash Auto Door Unlock
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Child Lock
    • Seat belt reminder
  • EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air)

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickEV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose ET BEV if you care more about power; choose EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) if you care more about interior space.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, ET BEV has a fuel consumption of 5.05, while EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, ET BEV has a wheelbase of 3000, while EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) has a wheelbase of 3099. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ET BEV uses Four-Wheel Drive, while EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) uses Rear Wheel Drive.