ET9 100kwh vs Renault Duster 2018 2.0L PE (4x2) Comparison

Car Information

4.3

/

16.2

/

Engine / Motor

/

173

/

4

Dimensions

4

5 Seater

5325

4315

2017

1822

1621

1682

3250

2673

/

408

Fuel Economy

/

12.2

/

50

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front & Back Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

35

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

AT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

255/45 R22

/

255/45 R22

/

/

Key Spec

TBD

/

707 BHP

105 BHP - 153 BHP

AT

Automatic & CVT & Manual

Electric

Gasoline

TBD

/

4

5 - 5

/

1.3 L - 2.0 L

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

Electric

Gasoline

707 BHP

135 BHP

/

2.0 L

/

195

Motor

700

/

/

2

/

Technologies

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • ET9 100kwh

    • Rear AC Controls
    • Push Button Start
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Front Cross Traffic Alert
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Active Safety Warning System
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder
  • Renault Duster 2018 2.0L PE (4x2)

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Speed Limiter
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickET9 100kwh

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose ET9 100kwh if you care more about price; choose Renault Duster 2018 2.0L PE (4x2) if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nio | ET9 100kwh

VS

Avatr | 11 AWD

Nio | ET9 100kwh

VS

Exeed | LX Flagship 1.6T

Nio | ET9 100kwh

VS

Tank | 500 Signature 3.0T

Nio | ET9 100kwh

VS

Tank | 500 Prestige 3.0T

Nio | ET9 100kwh

VS

Tank | 500 Signature 2.0T HEV

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, ET9 100kwh has a fuel consumption of No data, while Renault Duster 2018 2.0L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 8.2. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, ET9 100kwh has a wheelbase of 3250, while Renault Duster 2018 2.0L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2673. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ET9 100kwh, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ET9 100kwh uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Renault Duster 2018 2.0L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.