CarteaCompare Carsetron 95 kWh Quattro vs SQ8 4.0 TFSI quattro (507 HP)

etron 95 kWh Quattro vs SQ8 4.0 TFSI quattro (507 HP) Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

250 km/h

/

8

/

3996 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4 Doors

5 Doors

4901 mm

4986 mm

1935 mm

1995 mm

1616 mm

1705 mm

2928 mm

2995 mm

660 L

605 L

/

195 m

Fuel Economy

/

12.5 Km/L

/

85 L

/

12.5 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

4-Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

12.6

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

16

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

TBD

/

402 BHP

500 BHP - 507 BHP

Automatic

Automatic

Electric

Gasoline & Petrol

356 km

/

5 Seater

5 Seater

/

4.0 L

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

Electric

Gasoline

402 BHP

507 BHP

664 Nm

770 Nm

/

V

/

4.0 L

/

Single Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • etron 95 kWh Quattro

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • ABS
  • SQ8 4.0 TFSI quattro (507 HP)

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's Picketron 95 kWh Quattro

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose etron 95 kWh Quattro if you care more about price; choose SQ8 4.0 TFSI quattro (507 HP) if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Audi | etron 95 kWh Quattro

VS

Cadillac | Escalade 6.2L Sport

Audi | etron 95 kWh Quattro

VS

Cadillac | Cadillac Escalade 2023 6.2L Sport

Audi | etron 95 kWh Quattro

VS

Maserati | Levante MODENA ULTIMA

Audi | etron 95 kWh Quattro

VS

Cadillac | Cadillac Escalade 2024 6.2L Premium Luxury

Audi | SQ8 4.0 TFSI quattro (507 HP)

VS

Cadillac | Escalade 6.2L Sport

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, etron 95 kWh Quattro has a fuel consumption of No data, while SQ8 4.0 TFSI quattro (507 HP) has a fuel consumption of 8. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, etron 95 kWh Quattro has a wheelbase of 2928 mm, while SQ8 4.0 TFSI quattro (507 HP) has a wheelbase of 2995 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, SQ8 4.0 TFSI quattro (507 HP), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. etron 95 kWh Quattro uses All Wheel Drive, while SQ8 4.0 TFSI quattro (507 HP) uses All Wheel Drive.