EV9 GT vs Defender 90 SE (P300) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
191 km/h
/
4
/
GCC
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
5010
4583 mm
1980
2008 mm
1755
1969 mm
3100
2587 mm
90
397 L
52
/
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
/
10 Km/L
/
88 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
201 BHP - 380
300 BHP - 517 BHP
Automatic & Automatic & E-SHIFT (SBW)
Automatic
Electric
Gasoline
TBD
/
6 - 7
5 Seater - 8 Seater
/
2.0 L - 5.0 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
/
2.0 L
Electric
Gasoline
380
300 BHP
283
/
700
400 Nm
4000
/
/
V
/
Single Turbo
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
EV9 GT
- Power Tailgate
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Lane Following Assist
- Security System
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Active Safety Warning System
- Lane Keeping Assist
Defender 90 SE (P300)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEV9 GT
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EV9 GT if you care more about price; choose Defender 90 SE (P300) if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EV9 GT has a fuel consumption of No data, while Defender 90 SE (P300) has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EV9 GT has a wheelbase of 3100, while Defender 90 SE (P300) has a wheelbase of 2587 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EV9 GT, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EV9 GT uses No data, while Defender 90 SE (P300) uses All Wheel Drive.