Everest 2025 XLS 2.0T Diesel vs CX60 2025 High Plus Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
/
4
/
1996 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
18
20 Inch
5 Doors
/
4914
4740
2207
1890
1842
1686
2900
/
259 L
/
225
/
Fuel Economy
12
/
80 L
/
12 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
6
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10
12 Inch
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
12
/
Bose
Transmission
6-Speed Selectshift AT
8-speed Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.3 L
3.3 L - 3.3 L
170 BHP - 296 BHP
280 HP - 284 BHP
10-Speed Selectshift AT & 6-Speed Selectshift AT & Automatic
8 SPEED SKYACTIV® WITH Mi-DRIVE & 8-speed Automatic
Diesel & Gasoline
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0
3.3 L
Diesel
Gasoline
2.0L Turbo Diesel
/
4
/
170 BHP
284 BHP
405 Nm
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Everest 2025 XLS 2.0T Diesel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
CX60 2025 High Plus
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- Perfect performance in off-road driving
- Powerful and modern exterior design
- Advanced interior equipment and driving comfort
Negative
- Fuel consumption is relatively high
- Interior details need to be developed
- The entertainment system needs to improve the user interface
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Everest 2025 XLS 2.0T Diesel if you care more about overall equipment; choose CX60 2025 High Plus if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Everest 2025 XLS 2.0T Diesel has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while CX60 2025 High Plus has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Everest 2025 XLS 2.0T Diesel has a wheelbase of 2900, while CX60 2025 High Plus has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Everest 2025 XLS 2.0T Diesel uses Four-Wheel Drive, while CX60 2025 High Plus uses Four-Wheel Drive.