Everest 2025 XLS 2.0T Diesel vs Defender 90 SE (P300) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
191 km/h
4
4
1996 cc
/
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
18
/
5 Doors
5 Doors
4914
4583 mm
2207
2008 mm
1842
1969 mm
2900
2587 mm
259 L
397 L
225
/
Fuel Economy
12
10 Km/L
80 L
88 L
12 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
10
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
/
Transmission
6-Speed Selectshift AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.3 L
2.0 L - 5 L
170 BHP - 296 BHP
300 BHP - 635
10-Speed Selectshift AT & 6-Speed Selectshift AT & Automatic
8-speed ZF automatic transmission & Automatic
Diesel & Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 8 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
V
2.0
2.0 L
Diesel
Gasoline
2.0L Turbo Diesel
/
4
/
170 BHP
300 BHP
405 Nm
400 Nm
/
Single Turbo
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Everest 2025 XLS 2.0T Diesel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Defender 90 SE (P300)
Review Comparison
Positive
- Perfect performance in off-road driving
- Powerful and modern exterior design
- Advanced interior equipment and driving comfort
Negative
- Fuel consumption is relatively high
- Interior details need to be developed
- The entertainment system needs to improve the user interface
Positive
- Superior off-road capability
- Luxurious and durable interior design
- Multiple options for powerful engines
Negative
- High price compared to competitors
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- A bit complicated infotainment system
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Everest 2025 XLS 2.0T Diesel if you care more about price; choose Defender 90 SE (P300) if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Everest 2025 XLS 2.0T Diesel has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while Defender 90 SE (P300) has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Everest 2025 XLS 2.0T Diesel is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Everest 2025 XLS 2.0T Diesel has a wheelbase of 2900, while Defender 90 SE (P300) has a wheelbase of 2587 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Everest 2025 XLS 2.0T Diesel, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Everest 2025 XLS 2.0T Diesel uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Defender 90 SE (P300) uses All Wheel Drive.