Everest 2025 Limited vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
2296 cc
1998 cc
GCC
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
21
/
4 Doors
5 Doors
4914
4760 mm
2207
1930 mm
1842
1927 mm
2900
2750 mm
259 L
400 L
225
224 m
Fuel Economy
11 Km/L
10 Km/L
80 L
75 L
11 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
6
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12
12.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
12
9
Transmission
✓
/
10-Speed Selectshift AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.3 L
2.0 L
170 BHP - 296 BHP
223 BHP - 342 BHP
10-Speed Selectshift AT & 6-Speed Selectshift AT & Automatic
Automatic
Diesel & Gasoline
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.3
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
4
296 BHP
224 BHP
420 Nm
387 Nm
/
Single Turbo
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Everest 2025 Limited
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Perfect performance in off-road driving
- Powerful and modern exterior design
- Advanced interior equipment and driving comfort
Negative
- Fuel consumption is relatively high
- Interior details need to be developed
- The entertainment system needs to improve the user interface
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Everest 2025 Limited if you care more about fuel economy; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Everest 2025 Limited has a fuel consumption of 9.09, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Everest 2025 Limited is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Everest 2025 Limited has a wheelbase of 2900, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Everest 2025 Limited, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Everest 2025 Limited uses Four Wheel Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.