Expedition 2025 AWD vs 5 2WD Standard Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
180 km/h
6
/
Dimensions
8
5 Seater
5636
4710 mm
2029
1930 mm
1941
1620 mm
3343
2875 mm
592
367 L
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
8.1
/
107
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
3.5 L - 3496 L
/
300 BHP - 440
220 BHP - 530 BHP
10-Speed Selectshift Automatic & 10-Speed SelectshifteAutomatic & Automatic
TBD
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
7 Seater - 8
5 Seater
/
TBD
/
483 km - 500 km
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5
/
Gasoline
Electric
440 BHP
295 BHP
691
420 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Expedition 2025 AWD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear AC Controls
- Electric Curtain - Rear
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Rollover stability control
- Runflat Tyres
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Door Reflectors
- Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
- Tire Repair Kit
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- First Aid Kit
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
5 2WD Standard
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
- Child Lock
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Excellent towing ability
- Comfort and ride quality
Negative
- Fuel consumption is high
- Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
- The initial purchase price is high
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Expedition 2025 AWD if you care more about interior space; choose 5 2WD Standard if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Expedition 2025 AWD has a fuel consumption of 12.35, while 5 2WD Standard has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Expedition 2025 AWD has a wheelbase of 3343, while 5 2WD Standard has a wheelbase of 2875 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Expedition 2025 AWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Expedition 2025 AWD uses All Wheel Drive, while 5 2WD Standard uses Rear Wheel Drive.