Expedition Active 4X2 2025 vs Defender 90 SE (P300) Comparison

Car Information

6.0

/

Engine / Motor

190

191 km/h

6

4

/

GCC

Dimensions

8

5 Seater

5636

4583 mm

2029

2008 mm

1941

1969 mm

3343

2587 mm

592

397 L

/

5 Doors

Fuel Economy

10.3

10 Km/L

107

88 L

/

10 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

8

/

/

/

Fabric

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

Dual Stage front airbags, frontseat side impact airbags,Safety Canopy (includes thirdrow)

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12

/

/

/

/

6

/

Transmission

10-Speed Selectshift Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Rear Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

265/70 R18

/

265/70 R18

/

Key Spec

3.5 L - 5.4 L

2.0 L - 5 L

300 BHP - 440

300 BHP - 635

10-Speed Selectshift Automatic & 10-Speed SelectshifteAutomatic & Automatic

8-speed ZF automatic transmission & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

6 Seater - 8

5 - 8 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.5

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

400

300 BHP

650

400 Nm

/

V

/

Single Turbo

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Expedition Active 4X2 2025

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Active Bonnet
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Speed Limiter
    • Crash Auto Door Unlock
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • Defender 90 SE (P300)

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • Spacious interior space
    • Excellent towing ability
    • Comfort and ride quality

    Negative

    • Fuel consumption is high
    • Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
    • The initial purchase price is high

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickExpedition Active 4X2 2025

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Expedition Active 4X2 2025 if you care more about price; choose Defender 90 SE (P300) if you care more about overall equipment.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Ford | Expedition Active 4X2 2025

    VS

    Lincoln | Lincoln Corsair 2024 2.0T Reserve Luxury

    Ford | Expedition Active 4X2 2025

    VS

    Infiniti | Infiniti QX55 2024 2.0T Essential (AWD)

    Ford | Expedition Active 4X2 2025

    VS

    Cadillac | Cadillac XT4 2024 2.0T Premium Luxury (AWD)

    Ford | Expedition Active 4X2 2025

    VS

    Nissan | Nissan Patrol Safari 2020 Gazelle M/T

    Ford | Expedition Active 4X2 2025

    VS

    Nissan | Nissan Patrol Safari 2019 Gazelle M/T

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Expedition Active 4X2 2025 has a fuel consumption of 9.71, while Defender 90 SE (P300) has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Expedition Active 4X2 2025 is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Expedition Active 4X2 2025 has a wheelbase of 3343, while Defender 90 SE (P300) has a wheelbase of 2587 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Expedition Active 4X2 2025, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Expedition Active 4X2 2025 uses Rear Drive, while Defender 90 SE (P300) uses All Wheel Drive.