Expedition Active 4X2 2025 vs Prado GXR 2.4T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
180 km/h
6
4
/
2393 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
8
7 Seater
5636
4925 mm
2029
1980 mm
1941
1935 mm
3343
2850 mm
592
104 L
/
5 Doors
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
10.3
10.6 Km/L
107
110 L
/
10.6 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
8
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Fabric
Fabric
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
3-Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
Dual Stage front airbags, frontseat side impact airbags,Safety Canopy (includes thirdrow)
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12
12.3
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
6
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
10-Speed Selectshift Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
265/70 R18
/
265/70 R18
/
Key Spec
3.5 L - 5.4 L
2.4 L - 2.4 L
300 BHP - 440
201 - 267
10-Speed Selectshift Automatic & 10-Speed SelectshifteAutomatic & Automatic
8-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
6 Seater - 8
7 - 7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
Engine
3.5
2.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
400
267 BHP
650
430 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Expedition Active 4X2 2025
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Limiter
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Prado GXR 2.4T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Excellent towing ability
- Comfort and ride quality
Negative
- Fuel consumption is high
- Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
- The initial purchase price is high
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Expedition Active 4X2 2025 if you care more about price; choose Prado GXR 2.4T if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Expedition Active 4X2 2025 has a fuel consumption of 9.71, while Prado GXR 2.4T has a fuel consumption of 9.43. Therefore, Prado GXR 2.4T is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Expedition Active 4X2 2025 has a wheelbase of 3343, while Prado GXR 2.4T has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Expedition Active 4X2 2025, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Expedition Active 4X2 2025 uses Rear Drive, while Prado GXR 2.4T uses Four Wheel Drive.