Expedition Stealth Performance 4X4 2025 vs RX Comfort 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
185 km/h
6
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
8
5 Seater
5636
4781 mm
2029
1920 mm
1941
1671 mm
3343
2815 mm
592
500 L
/
5 Doors
/
187 m
Fuel Economy
9.8
16 Km/L
107
50 L
/
16 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
Interior
24
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Unique luxury leatherseats
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
Dual Stage front airbags, frontseat side impact airbags,Safety Canopy (includes thirdrow)
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
13.2
12.3
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
22
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
10-Speed Selectshift Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
275/50 R22
/
275/50 R22
/
Key Spec
3.5 L - 5.4 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
300 BHP - 440
245 HP - 261 BHP
10-Speed Selectshift Automatic & 10-Speed SelectshifteAutomatic & Automatic
7DCT & 8AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
6 Seater - 8
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
Engine
3.5
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
440
261 BHP
691
400 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Expedition Stealth Performance 4X4 2025
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Limiter
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
RX Comfort 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Excellent towing ability
- Comfort and ride quality
Negative
- Fuel consumption is high
- Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
- The initial purchase price is high
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Expedition Stealth Performance 4X4 2025 if you care more about interior space; choose RX Comfort 2.0T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Expedition Stealth Performance 4X4 2025 has a fuel consumption of 10.2, while RX Comfort 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 6.25. Therefore, RX Comfort 2.0T is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Expedition Stealth Performance 4X4 2025 has a wheelbase of 3343, while RX Comfort 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2815 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Expedition Stealth Performance 4X4 2025, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Expedition Stealth Performance 4X4 2025 uses Four-Wheel Drive, while RX Comfort 2.0T uses Front Wheel Drive.