Expedition Stealth Performance 4X4 2025 vs Tang L EV 670 Standard Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
/
6
/
Dimensions
8
7
5636
5040
2029
1996
1941
1760
3343
2950
592
/
Fuel Economy
9.8
/
107
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
24
/
✓
/
✓
/
Unique luxury leatherseats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Dual Stage front airbags, frontseat side impact airbags,Safety Canopy (includes thirdrow)
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
13.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
22
/
Transmission
10-Speed Selectshift Automatic
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
275/50 R22
/
275/50 R22
/
Key Spec
3.5 L - 5.4 L
/
300 BHP - 440
680 BHP
10-Speed Selectshift Automatic & 10-Speed SelectshifteAutomatic & Automatic
DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
6 Seater - 8
7
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
3.5
/
Gasoline
Electric
440
680 BHP
691
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Expedition Stealth Performance 4X4 2025
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Limiter
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Tang L EV 670 Standard
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Excellent towing ability
- Comfort and ride quality
Negative
- Fuel consumption is high
- Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
- The initial purchase price is high
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Expedition Stealth Performance 4X4 2025 if you care more about interior space; choose Tang L EV 670 Standard if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Expedition Stealth Performance 4X4 2025 has a fuel consumption of 10.2, while Tang L EV 670 Standard has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Expedition Stealth Performance 4X4 2025 has a wheelbase of 3343, while Tang L EV 670 Standard has a wheelbase of 2950. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Expedition Stealth Performance 4X4 2025, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Expedition Stealth Performance 4X4 2025 uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Tang L EV 670 Standard uses No data.