Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD vs Hino 300 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
240 km/h
/
6
/
3500 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
8 Seater
3
5 Doors
/
5334 mm
4,765
2006 mm
1,880
1930 mm
2,200
3111 mm
3,430
530 L
/
250 m
/
Fuel Economy
11 Km/L
6.6 km/L
88 L
/
11 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
/
Transmission
/
6-speed Manual transmission
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
3.5 L - 5.4 L
4.0 L
300 BHP - 440
147
10-Speed Selectshift Automatic & 10-Speed SelectshifteAutomatic & Automatic
6-speed Manual transmission
Gasoline & Petrol
Diesel
TBD
TBD
6 Seater - 8
3
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
V
/
3.5 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Diesel
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
380 BHP
147
637 Nm
420
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Hino 300
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Excellent towing ability
- Comfort and ride quality
Negative
- Fuel consumption is high
- Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
- The initial purchase price is high
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD if you care more about fuel economy; choose Hino 300 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD has a fuel consumption of 9.09, while Hino 300 has a fuel consumption of 15.15. Therefore, Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD has a wheelbase of 3111 mm, while Hino 300 has a wheelbase of 3,430. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Hino 300, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Hino 300 uses No data.