Explorer 2025 Active 200A vs Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
240 km/h
4
6
/
3500 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
7
8 Seater
18
/
5049
5334 mm
2004
2006 mm
1775
1930 mm
3025
3111 mm
515
530 L
/
5 Doors
/
250 m
Fuel Economy
12.7
11 Km/L
67
88 L
/
11 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
13.2
12
✓
✓
✓
/
6
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
Transmission
10 Speed Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
255/65 R18
/
255/65 R18
/
Key Spec
2.3 L - 3.5 L
3.5 L - 5.4 L
290 BHP - 400 BHP
300 BHP - 440
10 Speed Automatic & 10 Speed Selectshift Automatic & Automatic & CVT
10-Speed Selectshift Automatic & 10-Speed SelectshifteAutomatic & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 - 7
6 Seater - 8
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.3
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
2.3L EcoBoost L4
/
300 BHP
380 BHP
420
637 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Explorer 2025 Active 200A
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear AC Controls
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Rollover stability control
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Excellent towing ability
- Comfort and ride quality
Negative
- Fuel consumption is high
- Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
- The initial purchase price is high
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Explorer 2025 Active 200A if you care more about price; choose Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Explorer 2025 Active 200A has a fuel consumption of 7.87, while Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, Explorer 2025 Active 200A is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Explorer 2025 Active 200A has a wheelbase of 3025, while Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD has a wheelbase of 3111 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Explorer 2025 Active 200A uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD uses Rear Wheel Drive.